I've been pretty awed by the profound things my own kids say about faith and doubt, not only now at 8 and 10, but for years. Sometimes my daughter will say she thinks all this Jesus stuff is what adults made up to make children behave (moralistic children's sermons, anyone?). This week I got asked the following question by a teen and I think it is pretty interesting, both her way of framing the question, and what it represents in terms of what Charles Taylor talks about as our social imaginary. She lives in a Lutheran family, goes to church most Sundays and has her whole life, and yet she lives in a culture where the questions raised are of the 'scientifically curious' sort. How can we not deal with that in our apologetics? I think too often we side-step the fundamental of talking about how we might believe at all and move quickly to questions of the bible or Christian life.
So, she asked:
"Is it OK to be confused about God? I mean, I don't have any proof he's here, and as a member of the overtly cynical 1990s generation, I wanted to know if there really is evidence for Jesus and God's existence. If there is, could you show some? (Just so you know, this question isn't meant in a "ha there is no evidence" way, but rather a "I'm scientifically curious" way.)"
And I answered:
I hope it is okay. Most of the disciples who followed Jesus were confused about who he was! I love the story in Mark 9 that ends with this exclamation: "No sooner were the words out of his mouth than the father cried, 'Then I believe. Help me with my doubts!'" That for me is a faith statement.
Did Jesus exists? No question, really. The historical evidence is overwhelming. Similar to Aristotle or Julius Caesar, we don't have photos or video. But it is not really in doubt that he lived and died and then appeared alive again to his disciples whose lives were so dramatically changed by the events that they each--to a person--died in the service of their mission to tell the story of Jesus. God? Evidence is an interesting question. Science tells us about natural phenomena: does an apple always fall from a tree? (Newton, law of gravity). God questions have to do with other sorts of questions (non-scientific questions). Not 'how did the world get here' but 'why are we here' and 'what is life for?' How you answer the first can influence the second and third, of course, but belief in evolution, for instance, by no means precludes belief in God, or in a loving purpose behind the unfolding of life on earth. I think about the nature of human relationships as evidence--how deeply we need each other, need affirmation, need love, to thrive. It is in our deepest nature to need that. Doesn't that point to the possibility of an ultimate love as our source? I also think about the beauty of nature--a horse, for example, and the complexity and beauty of the variety of horses. Or a simple, single rose. Or a very amazing song. All have this creative and awesome spark that makes me feel grateful and awed. I take the leap of faith and say, the source of that creative spark, that original place of love and logic, is God. Do you have to come out there? No, lots of people don't. But I think it makes life harder, and makes less sense to not believe. Jesus, then, becomes a living guide in understanding God. He is like a window in the skies, helping me to know personally the unknown God.
Anon, and peace,
Chris
Recent Comments