I wanted to post the really interesting comments of my friend Mike Wilker in response to my post a couple days ago about the blockbuster movie Avatar. He's really smart and loves pop culture, especially movies (as you see by the ending). Anon, and peace, Chris
Dear Chris,
I tried to comment on your blog, but couldn't. So I'm sending you my thoughts via FB.
I
saw Avatar in 2-D on the largest screen in DC. I was psyched to see it
since I love sci-fi. While I was entertained by the delights on
Pandora, the techo-virtuosity of the filmmakers didn't allow me to
ignore three main concerns. 1) The White Man of privilege cum race
traitor and Savior of the People of Color. I was stunned to see this
story line exaggerated so. The White Man doesn't just switch sides in
solidarity to defend against injustice, nor do he and his compatriots
form a community with the people of color that liberates and reconciles
both "sides;" in Avatar the White Man is incarnate as a blue hybrid,
saves the alien race, is killed and reborn. Think about this
theologically: who is being saved and by what means? And, you don't
have to equate the Avatar with Jesus Christ. What about simply thinking
of the Avatar as one of Jesus' disciples like St. Francis Xavier--or
even like you or me, at times?
2) The religious rituals in the
movie were laughable to me. I know we liturgical Christians in our garb
do appear and sound quite odd to the rest of U.S. society. And
Christian mystics like Francis, Eckart, Catherine, Teresa, Thomas and
Dorothy acted strangely. But the religious rituals reminded me of bad
movies of natives jumping and dancing in African jungles. I found it
hard to take the Na'Vi rituals seriously, but the images are
provocative. Seeing the Na'Vi made me embarrassed to be seen praying in
public, or eating bread which I believe is both really bread and really
God's presence for me, or talking about the Holy Spirit that blows
where she will, or reading that there is a tree whose leaves are for
the healing of the nations.
3) The battle scene at the end is
way too long and over the top. My body was tense and wrung out after
witnessing the destruction. I think it glorified war and revenge
killing.
Regarding Ross Douthat, I think he saw an easy target
in the ridiculous appearing rituals. It was a "straw man" for his
arguments against part of the historic Christian tradition as well as
"New Age" theology, neither of which he respects. Mr. Douthat appeals
for Christian theology, worship and other practices that help us
"escape upward" or at least for "God to take on flesh and come among
us, as the Christmas story has it" to save us from our tragic, agonized
position as part of creation that suffers and dies. The cartoonish
portrayal of religion in Avatar gave Mr. Douthat as easy way to assail
Christian theology and practice that cares deeply, honestly for this
creation. There are a lot of holes in his arguments, as well as in his
characterizations of both the Na'Vi and Christian traditions. Maybe
this is due to the newspaper column format and the intention of
columnists to be opinionated and provocative themselves.
OK, but
here's the clinker: Since I love sci-fi anyway--I want to go see Avatar
again in 3-D, but I have a hard time paying/rewarding a movie that is
bad in so many other ways. Now that (Mr. Douthat) is not agonizingly
tragic, just laughably ironic. (Judy laughed feebly at my attempted
humor.)
Peace,
Mike
Recent Comments